Billet par : Tilleane Charavel
Du 1er au 3 juillet dernier, se tenait à l’Université de Leiden le colloque international « Bound for Devotion : The Prayer Book as Object and Practice, 1300-1800 » organisé par le projet PRAYER (ERC Starting Grant). J’y ai eu l’occasion de présenter une communication intitulée « Exploring the Temporalities of Philip the Good’s Breviaries Ad usum Parisiorum pars hiemalis and pars aestivalis (Royal Library of Belgium, mss. 9511 and 9026) » qui vise à définir comment l’étude de ces temporalités constitue un prisme central pour comprendre la culture dévotionnelle ducale, ainsi que la manière dont elle articule la pratique religieuse et la représentation du pouvoir en place.

Descriptif (abrégé)
Philippe the Good’s winter and summer breviaries are copied from a Parisian liturgical model and illuminated in Bruges (1453-1460), chiefly by Willem Vrelant with two miniatures by Jean le Tavernier. Despite their exceptional quality, the manuscripts remain understudied since Leroquais’s 1929 study. The argument unfolds in three parts.
Prescribed time: The breviary’s codicological structure – its division into winter/summer volumes, the perpetual calendar, ferial psalter, common of saints, and sanctoral – embodies the cyclical, recurring rhythm of the liturgical year itself. Moving through the manuscript retraces this cycle materially, making the object not just a support for liturgical time but a form of it.
Superimposed time: Miniatures layer multiple temporal registers within a single visual space – founding/eschatological time, narrative time, celestial time, and the contemporary Flemish present – without hierarchy among them. A key example is the sanctoral-opening miniature showing Philip the Good in prayer before Saint Andrew, where the duke’s contemporary presence coexists with the saint’s timeless, hieratic figure.
Reflected time: This is presented as the paper’s central conceptual contribution, not a représentation-plus-text duality, but an intra-visual, semiotic phenomenon in which ducal emblems (the two facing E’s, the Golden Fleece collar, the Saint Andrew’s cross) function as condensed, legible signs of institutional history. Combined with the mise-en-abyme effect of the duke depicted performing the very devotional act his use of the book enacts, this produces a “doubled present” that continuously re-legitimizes ducal power by anchoring it in sacred and dynastic continuity.
The conclusion frames mss. 9511 and 9026 as a lens onto Burgundian devotional culture, where liturgical time, layered imagery, and symbolic reflexivity converge to make prayer an ongoing act of princely legitimation.






















