Ressources numériques en sciences humaines et sociales OpenEdition Nos plateformes OpenEdition Books OpenEdition Journals Hypothèses Calenda Bibliothèques OpenEdition Freemium Suivez-nous

Gem: Reading and Preserving the News: A Printed News Report in a Composite Volume

Nakkaş Osman, Suleiman I during the siege of Rhodes (1522)

Billet rédigé par Marie Verbiest

Perusing an early sixteenth-century Heidelberg codex, we encounter – amid various literary and historiographical works – a printed news report of the 1522 siege of Rhodes. Printed on low-quality paper and sold at cheap prices, these newssheets were not necessarily intended to be preserved, which is why many of them have been lost over time. The ones that do survive, however, have been conserved in a wide variety of ways: compiled into small booklets with carton covers, folded and kept between the pages of another book, or, as in our Heidelberg case, bound together in a composite codex alongside other works. These kinds of recueils factices generate a multitude of compelling questions, not only about the ways in which texts were read, used and preserved, but also about the curatorial decisions – whether pragmatic and incidental or deliberate – that could shape the selection and compilation of different works into one volume. With regard to the mediatization of events, which news reports can be found in such composite volumes? Beyond revealing practices of conservation, what can this example tell us about the ways in which newsprints could be preserved and understood?

Figure 1: Warhafftige newe Zeytung der ubermessigen und grossmechtigen belegerung und bestreyttung
der hoch christenlichen stat Rhodis, printed by Hieronymus Höltzel in Nürnberg (1523),
Cod. Pal. germ. 127, fol. 114r, Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg.

Rhodes, newsprints, and the ‘Turkish threat’

After months of fighting with great effort to defend their stronghold on Rhodes, the Knights of St John were ultimately forced to surrender to the Ottoman army and withdrew from the island on January 1st, 1523. The siege, which had lasted over six months and had been especially destructive for the Ottoman army, ultimately lead to a redrawing of the boundaries between the spheres of influence of the Ottoman Empire and Christian Europe in the Eastern Mediterranean1. At the time, this event was the subject of many news reports printed all over Europe, a large part of them editions and translations of a letter written by a certain nobleman from Candia (Crete) named Marx Bogngol on the 10th of October 1522. Newssheets continued to be published in the first months of 1523. In the years directly following the siege, several more comprehensive and historiographical works on the event were published as well.

From the medium’s inception and throughout the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the “Turkish threat” proved to be one of the most consistently covered topics in printed news reports. In the early sixteenth century in particular, a substantial proportion of newssheets printed in Northwestern Europe focused on events associated with the ongoing Turckenkriege against the expanding Ottoman Empire. They reported on/mediatised events such as the conquest of Negroponte (1470), the sieges of Rhodes (1480 and 1522), the battle of Mohács (1526), and the siege of Vienna (1529). In fact, the fall of Negroponte in 1470 was one of the first events to be widely covered by this novel news medium2. In general, the skirmishes with and the fear of the advancing Ottoman Empire appeared to make compelling news stories.

Nakkaş Osman, Suleiman I during the siege of Rhodes (1522)
Figure 2: Nakkaş Osman, Suleiman I during the siege of Rhodes (1522),
Hazine 1517, fol. 149r, Topkapi Palace Museum.

The newssheet about the 1522 events included in the Heidelberg codex is entitled Warhafftige newe Zeytung der ubermessigen und grossmechtigen belegerung und bestreyttung der hoch christenlichen stat Rhodis (So der herr der Turcken nechst vergangen zweyunndtzweintzigisten jars furgenomen und gethan hat), which roughly translates to “True new report of the excessive and mighty siege and assault of the highly Christian city of Rhodes, which the lord of the Turks undertook and carried out in the most recently passed twenty-second year”. It was published by Hieronymus Höltzel in Nürnberg in 1523, counting seven pages, and at least seven copies have survived. The newssheet recounts the siege from the moment Soleiman I arrived on the island on the 26th of June to the beginning of October. Although printed in 1523, the text does not yet seem to be aware that the Ottomans had indeed conquered the city on the 1st of January 1523, stating:

“wo der Thurck dise Stat erobern sölt, so werden wir Christen ein sölchen jamer sehen in der gantzen Christenheit dasz wir selbs eynander erbarmen werden. Welches wir aber yetzo nit also bedencken könden.”

“If the Turk were to conquer this city, we Christians would see such misery throughout all Christendom that we would pity one another – something we are not yet able to fully comprehend.”

As the exact and precise date of printing (the month, the day) is unknown, we are left to wonder if Hieronymus Höltzel himself knew that the news he published, was, at that point, already outdated. It is entirely possible that he was fully aware, yet considered the text still relevant enough to publish it. At any rate, the fact that the newsprint had been overtaken by the events, along with its preservation in the codex – effectively ‘freezing’ it, as it were, in time – makes this example particularly interesting from a temporal point of view.

A newsprint in a composite volume

In the Heidelberg codex, which counts over 300 folios filled with text, we can find eight different works of various genres: a travel account, two chronicles, one literary work of fiction, two conduct books or manuals, a short pamphlet-like document, and one newsprint. The works, all of them in German, are more or less chronologically organised, starting with the most recent text – a manuscript one – dated 1528, to the oldest ones at the end, dated 1483 and 1486. Although these texts cover a wide range of topics, two of them, alongside our newssheet, are on the subject of the Turks as well: Die Turkisch Chronica, “The Turkish Chronicle”, by Johannes Adelphus, and a short document entitled Notel einer gemeinen Anlag wider den Türcken, which translates to “Note on a common undertaking [or “military action”] against the Turks”. Interestingly, these three works find themselves organised one after the other in the codex, in the following order: the Turkisch Chronica, the Notel, and the Warhafftige newe Zeytung.

The “Turkish Chronicle” by Adelphus had first been published by Martin Flach in Strasbourg in the year 1513, but the version we find in the codex was printed in 1516 by Johannes Knobloch in the same city. The chronicle recounts the history of the Ottoman Empire, “from its origin, beginning, and rule up to the present time, together with its wars and conflicts waged against the Christians” (“von irem ursprung anefang und Regiment biß uff dise zeit, sampt yrem kriegen und streyten mit den Christen begangen”), as stated by its subtitle. In these conflicts with the Ottoman Empire, the Knights of St John played a very important role, especially in the late fifteenth and early sixteenth century. Constantly competing for control of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea and its many islands and ports, the Hospitallers on Rhodes had already been – albeit unsuccessfully – besieged by Ottoman forces in 1480, one of the last important episodes recounted by Adelphus’ chronicle. Alongside the fall of Negroponte in 1470, this first siege of Rhodes was among the first events that were extensively reported on in European printed newssheets at the time.

After the chronicle, we find the “Note on a common undertaking against the Turks”, describing the financial aspect of a common war against the Ottoman Empire, and how much money will have to be raised among people of all standing. The print itself does not specify its publisher, nor its place or date of printing. Both the USTC and the VD 16 databases have attributed the copy to the Regensburg printer Paul Kohl, who would have published it in 1524. However, considering that the same text had also been printed one year later in Nürnberg by Hieronymus Höltzel – the printer who published the newssheet immediately following the “Note” in the codex – it could be possible that the Notel can be attributed to Höltzel instead of Kohl.

The compilation of works into these kinds of recueils factices, most often done at a much later date, can generally be attributed to the owner of the texts themselves. The same applies most likely to our codex, although the Heidelberg archives have dated the volume to around the early sixteenth century – not that much later than many of the texts’ publication dates. In any case, the person who compiled all these works together chose to put the three documents on the Ottomans side by side. Not only does this suggest the compiler likely made a decision informed by the subject matter of the different works. It also means that, when reading the codex as it is arranged, the newssheet on the 1522 siege of Rhodes seems to pick up where the chronicle left off, presenting the news report as a kind of continuation of the chronicle on the same topic. The chronicle concludes its chronological account with the siege of Rhodes of 1480, while the Warhafftige newe Zeytung from 1523 almost resumes the narrative to offer the latest information on the ongoing conflict with the Ottoman Empire in Rhodes.

TO COME

I am grateful to Alexandre Goderniaux and Marion Pouspin for their guidance on the subject of the recueils factices. The questions regarding practices of reading and preserving newsprints in the early sixteenth century are part of my research on the mediatisation of events and its influence on the perception of time.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Sources

Johannes Adelphus, Die Turckische Chronica, printed by Johannes Knobloch, Strasbourg (1516), Cod. Pal. germ. 127, fol. 60r-110r, Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg.

Notel einer gemeinen Anlag wider den Türcken (ca. 1524), Cod. Pal. germ. 127, 111r-113v, Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg.

Warhafftige newe Zeytung der ubermessigen und grossmechtigen belegerung und bestreyttung der hoch christenlichen stat Rhodis, printed by Hieronymus Höltzel, Nürnberg (1523), Cod. Pal. germ. 127, fol. 114r-117v, Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg.

Literature

Mathilde Bombart ed., Recueils factices. De la pratique de collection à la catégorie bibliographique, Pratiques & Formes Littéraires 16-18, vol. 18, 2021.

Margaret Meserve, “News from Negroponte: Politics, Popular Opinion, and Information Exchange in the First Decade of the Italian Press?”, Renaissance Quarterly, vol. 59, n° 2 (2006/07), p. 440-480.

Octave Julien, “Construction et composition des recueils français du XVe siècle: apports de la codicologie quantitative”, La mise en recueil des textes médiévaux, vol. 16 (2007), p. 13-30.

Robert Douglas Smith, Kelly Devries, Rhodes Besieged. A New History, Gloucestershire: The History Press, 2011.

Simon Philipps ed., The 1522 Siege of Rhodes: Causes, Course and Consequences, Routledge: London, 2022.

  1. Simon Philipps ed., The 1522 Siege of Rhodes: Causes, Course and Consequences, Routledge: London, 2022. []
  2. Margaret Meserve, “News from Negroponte: Politics, Popular Opinion, and Information Exchange in the First Decade of the Italian Press?”, Renaissance Quarterly, vol. 59, n° 2 (2006/07), p. 440-480. []

Participation à l’école d’été : Marie Verbiest a participé à l’école d’été « Fabriquer un livre au XVIe siècle »

Bourges, 22-28 juin 2025

Du 22 au 28 juin 2025, Marie Verbiest a participé à l’école d’été « La Fac-Tory : Fabriquer un livre au XVIe siècle » organisée par Rémi Jimenes (Université de Tours) et le Centre d’études supérieures de la Renaissance (Tours) au sein du projet TypoReF – Typographie de la Renaissance française, 1470-1640. Les activités étaient organisées à Bourges dans Les mille univers, où nous, un groupe d’environ 25 participants, avons réalisé l’impression d’un texte – de la mise en page et la composition typographique jusqu’à la conception de la couverture et la reliure manuelle.

Participation au colloque : Marie Verbiest a participé au 66e Rencontres du CEEB

“Les ducs de Bourgogne dans les conflits de leur temps (XIVe-XVIe siècles)”

Paderborn, 25-27 septembre 2025

Le 27 septembre 2025, Marie Verbiest a participé au colloque 66e Rencontres –  Les ducs de Bourgogne dans les conflits de leur temps (XIVe-XVIe siècles du Centre Européen des Études bourguignonnes (CEEB) à Paderborn. Elle a présenté une intervention, intitulée « Les feuilles d’actualité sur les guerres de Gueldre (1538-1543): Chambre d’écho des guerres d’Italie ? »

MON INTERVENTION

Sous l’impulsion de grands événements « internationaux » au début du XVIe siècle tout comme d’innovations technologiques comme l’imprimerie, apparaît ce que l’on appelle aujourd’hui « le marché des nouvelles ». Même si ces premières « feuilles d’actualité » traitaient généralement des conflits majeurs, un événement plus régional pouvait néanmoins recevoir une couverture médiatique considérable, comme ce fut le cas lors des guerres de Gueldre (1538-1543) entre Charles V et le duc de Gueldre lié aux droits de succession au duché. Dans cette communication, j’aimerais analyser la représentation de ce conflit et de ses principaux acteurs à travers les imprimés d’actualité. De quelle manière, au sein de la médiatisation, sont évoqués, expliqués et justifiés les événements ainsi que les actions des autorités impliquées dans cette confrontation ? Et comment un conflit régional a-t-il pu devenir la chambre d’écho d’un affrontement international bien plus vaste ?

Le Centre Européen d’Études bourguignonnes envisage de publier les actes de colloque au cours de l’automne 2026.

Gem: An emblem to mirror the narrative? Exploring the iconography of an Antwerp newsprint on the Guelders War of 1538-1543.”

Article written by Marie Verbiest

Sekere nyeuwe tijdinghe, printed in Antwerp (1543) USTC n° 408361)

Introduction

When preparing a presentation on the mediatization of the Guelders’ conflict of 1538-1543, I came across a rather unusual newsprint, not so much for its content as for the imagery it presented. Entitled Sekere nyeuwe tijdinghe vanden furst van Cleve ende Gulick wat steden, sloten ende dorpen etc dat hem afhendich ghemaect sijn, ende wat in brande ghesteken sijn, this newssheet recounts the various “cities, castles and villages” that had been seized by imperial forces from the Duke of Cleves, and, more importantly, which places “have been set on fire”1. Right beneath this lengthy title, we can see an imperial emblem. The peculiarity of this print lies not in the presence of the imperial emblem itself, which was very common, but in the small flames encircling it. Since the news report recounts areas that were set on fire, might the symbol have been intentionally adapted to reflect the content of the text? Can we, in other words, speak of an ‘actualization’ of a political emblem in light of a current event?

Mediatization of a conflict

When Charles II of Egmond (1467-1538), duke of Guelders, dies without an heir in the summer of 1538, a regional succession crisis provokes a large-scale international conflict implicating among others the Habsburg emperor, the French king, the Schmalkaldic League and the Ottomans. Charles V (1500-1558) had claimed his rights to the duchy as the descendant of the Dukes of Burgundy, since both his great-grandfather Charles the Bold (1433-1477) and his grandfather Maximilian I (1459-1519) had held the ducal title of Guelders2. Charles II of Egmont, however, had made a secret agreement with Francis I (1494-1547) in 1534, promising to grant the French king the duchy of Guelders upon his death. The Guelders’ Diet (Landdag) of 1537, on the other hand, rejected both candidates and appointed William V Duke of Cleves (1516-1592) instead. An armed conflict ensued in 1542-43, opposing the army of William V, aided by the French, and the imperial troops. This ended only in the summer of 1543, when the imperial army conquered Guelders and it was incorporated into the Habsburg Netherlands3.

Left: Portrait of Charles II of Egmond (1462-1538), duke of Guelders and count of Zutphen, oil on canvas, 46.5 x 58 cm (ca. 1518-1600), Museum Arnhem. Right: Clouet François, William V of Mark, duke of Cleves, Julier and Berg, called “the Rich” (1516-1592), black chalk on paper, 332 x 223 cm (ca. 1541), Musée Condé.)

Many contemporary newssheets printed all over Northwestern Europe testify to the destruction and violence that followed this succession crisis, especially in the Low Countries. As is the case with the print in question, several of these reports were composed in rime, meant to be recited or sung as well as read. Compared to newssheets written in prose, these prints favour a more literary use of language that infuse the text with symbolic meaning. This can be seen, for example, when our print describes the invasion by the Guelders’ army into Brabant (‘the lion’), which was eventually deterred by imperial troops (‘the eagle’): 

Si moghen den leuwe wel verradelick in sijn landen sluypen
Maer om te verscueren is hi te scarp getant den Arent doet hem onderstant
Hy ontluyct clauwen ende vlercken
Het tkeysers macht is quaet taenmercken.

They may treacherously stalk the lion in his own land
But he is too sharp-toothed to be torn apart the Eagle comes to his aid
He unfurls his claws and wings
The emperor’s power is hard to ignore4.

A Burgundian symbol

To return to our emblem, like on most of these prints, we can see a version of the imperial symbol of Charles V printed right on the first page: the two-headed eagle, the imperial crown, the Order of the Golden Fleece collar, the columns of Hercules with the famous “Plus Ultra” slogan, or – in this case – a combination of all four elements. Our print, however, is the only one – to my knowledge – that exhibits the imperial emblem with a remarkable addition: small flames surrounding the imperial crown.

zoom in on the emblem, Sekere nyeuwe tijdinghe, printed in Antwerp (1543) USTC n° 408361)

Flames or sparks that accompany a fire or flint stone (fusil or briquet in French) was the chosen symbol of Philip the Good (1396-1467), Duke of Burgundy, and appears as early as 1420 in his inventories. The symbol is generally interpreted as representing a policy of military aggression, chosen in response to the assassination of John the Fearless (1371-1419)5.

The symbol of the ‘fusil’ or flint stone surrounded by flames in the marginal decoration of the ducal copy of Le Mortifiement de Vaine Plaisance by René of Anjou, Brussels, KBR, MS. 10308, fol. 1, https://devise.saprat.fr/embleme/fusil

Dissecting the emblem printed on the title page of the newssheet in question, then, we can identify the flames along with the collar of the Order of the Golden Fleece as clear Burgundian symbols. The identification with Charles’ Burgundian heritage becomes even more apparent when we look at the content of the text itself. For example, our newsprint starts the text as follows: 

Verblijt this tijt, ghi Borgoensche sinnen
van deser blijder maren

Rejoice in this time, you Burgundian souls
of these cheerful tales

In general, newsprints on the Guelders’ War of 1538-43 portray the conflict, as well as the people and lands it affected, as distinctly ‘Burgundian’. Throughout the text, the imperial troops are consistently called ‘the Burgundians’ and we find multiple references to their bravery and military prowess. Even the lands that they took from the Duke of Cleves had, according to the text, “already wished to become Burgundian”6.

An emblem between symbolism and pragmatism

Refocusing on our peculiar emblem, it seems to me that its presence could be explained by several possible scenarios. Of course, first of all, it is possible that this emblem was simply the (only) one the printer had available. In this case, its presence merely testifies to an imperial- or ‘Burgundian’-minded printer, as evidenced by the content of the text itself, and nothing more. Unfortunately, given that the newssheet itself gives very little information as to the circumstances of its production, we know hardly anything about the creators or their intentions. We are left to wonder why the printer had this specific emblem in his possession, and what other purposes it could have served.

The second option echoes the question I introduced at the start of this post: could the emblem have been adapted to reflect the content of the text? Could it be that small flames were added because the narrative itself discusses cities and villages that had been set on fire? This seems plausible, considering that I have not (yet) found this particular emblem on any other print7. There are, however, other instances where a woodcut image has been modified to fit the topic of the print. One example is a news report on the sack of Rome, printed in Antwerp in 1527: it used a woodcut from a 1520 print and added a small shield displaying the letters ‘SPQR’, effectively identifying the city in the image as Rome8. Given that the reuse and ‘customizing’ of existing woodcuts to fit different purposes was a common, cost-efficient practice, it is entirely possible that this is the case with our newsprint9.

Left: Gherechtighe copie vander nieuwer tidinghe, printed in Antwerp by Jacob van Liesvelt (1527) USTC n° 415552; Right: Of the newe landes and of ye people founde, printed in Antwerp by Jan van Doesborch (1520) USTC n° 410154

In a third scenario, the imperial emblem could have been intentionally modified to highlight or accentuate Charles V’s Burgundian legacy, seeing as this plays a major role in the Guelders’ conflict. As mentioned earlier, many newsprints on the topic frame the conflict as one between the ‘Burgundian emperor’ and his ‘Burgundian Netherlands’ on the one hand, and the Duke of Cleves – who is, in reality, under the control of the French king – on the other. From this perspective, it makes sense that the emblem would be adapted to call attention to Charles’ Burgundian heritage. We could even argue that the flames are used in the same way as under Philip the Good, expressing the military dominance of the Habsburg-Burgundian house over the French kingdom.

Conclusion

Considering these different options, a few points can be made with reasonable certainty: the little flames are undoubtably a Burgundian symbol that – whether intentionally or not – underscore the topic and narrative of the text. Moreover, like we’ve seen, woodcuts could be adapted to fit the topic of the text. This adaptability illustrates the nuanced interaction between text and image – an aspect I intend to explore further in my study of this medium. With the aforementioned elements in mind, I lean more towards the second and third scenario, in which the emblem is effectively adapted to the text. Ultimately, whatever the intentions of the author or printer – and whether the emblem was meant to echo the text or not – the newssheet effectively highlights both Charles V’s Burgundian heritage and his military dominance, conveyed through the text itself and the imperial symbol that accompanies it.

TO COME

I am grateful to Elodie Lecuppre-Desjardin and Maxim Hoffman of our WP 3 for sharing their time and insights, which greatly helped in shaping my reflections on this topic. This post is connected to my ongoing research on the mediatization of the Guelders’ conflict, a part of which I presented at the 66th Rencontres of the Centre Européen d’Études Bourguignonnes (CEEB) in Paderborn in September 2025. Here my focus lay on the peculiarities of the ‘media coverage’ of this conflict, as well as the narrative portrayal of those in power in these newsprints. The collected papers of this conference are expected to be published in the autumn of 2026. Within the scope of my thesis, entitled “Expanding Horizons. Media Impact of International Events in Printed News Reports in the Early Sixteenth Century”, the Guelders War of 1538-43 is one of the six events that I study to examine the media impact of early sixteenth century events in printed news reports.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Sources

Sekere nyeuwe tijdinghe vanden furst van Cleve ende Gulick wat steden sloten, ende dorpen, & dat hem afhendich ghemaect sijn, ende wat in brande ghesteken sijn, printed in Antwerp (1543), USTC n° 408361, Centrale Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent: Rés. 423/3, digitized version via Google.

Gherechtige copie vander nieuwer tidinghe welcke die ionghe Montrichart ghebracht heeft van Roomen, printed in Antwerp byJacob van Liesvelt (1527) USTC n° 415552, Centrale Bibliotheek van de Universiteit Gent: Meul 11/2, digitized version via Google. Of the newe landes and of ye people founde by the messengers of the kynge of Portygale named Emanuel, printed in Antwerp by Jan van Doesborch (1520) USTC n° 410154, British Library London: G.7106, digitized version via USTC.

Literature

Arthur M. Hind, An Introduction to a History of Woodcut, 2 vols, Houghton Mifflin: Boston, 1935.

Renate Holzschuh-Hofer, ‘Feuereisen im Dienst politischer Propaganda von Burgund bis Habsburg. Zur Entwicklung der Symbolik des Ordens vom Goldenen Vlies von Herzog Philipp dem Guten bis Kaiser Ferdinand I.’, RIHA Journal 6 (2010): 1-47.

Marjolijn Kruip, ‘Jan van Battel (1477-1557), (heraldisch) schilder in Mechelen. Kunstenaar, werken en nieuwe vondsten’, Handelingen van de Koninklijke Kring voor Oudheidkunde, Letteren en Kunst van Mechelen 119 (2015), 105-139.

Elodie Lecuppre-Desjardin, The Illusion of the Burgundian State, trans. by Christopher Fletcher, Manchester University Press: Manchester, 2022.

Markus Neuwirth, ‘Plus Ultra – Origins and Impact of Emperor Charles V’s Imprese’, Plus Ultra. Beyond Modernity, Stefan Bidner (ed.), Thomas Feuerstein (ed.), Frankfurt am Main, Revolver, 2005, 305-352.

Aart Noordzij, Gelre: dynastie, land en identiteit in de late middeleeuwen, Hilversum, Uitgeverij Verloren, 2008.

Marion Pouspin, ‘La relation texte-image dans les pièces gothiques. De la pensée conceptuelle des imprimeurs à l’expérience du lecteur’, Perspectives Médiévales 38 (2017),

Earl E. Rosenthal, ‘The Invention of the Columnar Device of Emperor Charles V at the Court of Burgundy in Flanders in 1516’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 36 (1973): 198-230.Steven Thiry, Anne-Laure Van Bruaene, ‘Burgundian Afterlives: Appropriating the Dynastic Past(s) in the Habsburg Netherlands’, Dutch Crossing 43, n° 1 (2019), 1-6.



  1. Sekere nyeuwe tijdinghe vanden furst van Cleve ende Gulick wat steden sloten, ende dorpen, & dat hem afhendich ghemaect sijn, ende wat in brande ghesteken sijn, printed in Antwerp (1543), USTC n° 408361, Centrale Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent: Rés. 423/3, digitized version on Google Books []
  2. Aart Noordzij, Gelre: dynastie, land en identiteit in de late middeleeuwen (Hilversum, Uitgeverij Verloren, 2008), 52. []
  3. Ibid., 177-179. []
  4. Any translation into English is mine. []
  5. https://devise.saprat.fr/embleme/fusil []
  6. “Die landen willen al borgoens wesen”, my italics. []
  7. We do, of course, find the ‘briquet’ surrounded by flames incorporated in imperial artworks such as the tryptic made by Jan van Battel in 1517-18, or in the heraldic representations painted in the Cathedral of Barcelona for the XIX Chapter meeting of the Order of the Golden Fleece in 1519: Jan van Battel, ‘Triptiek met Karel van Habsburg als koning van Spanje’ (1517-1518) oil on canvas (97,7 x 67,3 cm – middle pannel) (97,7 x 33,4 cm – side pannels), Hof van Busleyden, Mechelen; Markus Nieuwirth, ‘Plus Ultra – Origins and Impact of Charles V’s Imprese’, Plus Ultra. Beyond Modernity, Stefan Bidner (ed.), Thomas Feuerstein (ed.) (Frankfurt am Main, Revolver, 2005), 333. []
  8. The print on the sack of Rome: Gherechtige copie vander nieuwer tidinghe welcke die ionghe Montrichart ghebracht heeft van Roomen, printed in Antwerp by Jacob van Liesvelt (1527) USTC n° 415552. The print displaying the same woodcut-image: Of the newe landes and of ye people founde by the messengers of the kynge of Portygale named Emanuel, printed in Antwerp by Jan van Doesborch (1520) USTC n° 410154. The image in this last print is potentially a portrayal of the Siege of Jacob’s Ford (1179). []
  9. Arthur M. Hind, An Introduction to a History of Woodcut, 2 vols, II (Houghton Mifflin: Boston, 1935): 284-285; Marion Pouspin, ‘La relation texte-image dans les pièces gothiques. De la pensée conceptuelle des imprimeurs à l’expérience du lecteur’, Perspectives Médiévales 38 (2017), URL : http://journals.openedition.org/peme/12646. []

Review : Annual Congress of the Flemish-Dutch Association for New History

Leuven, October 25 2024

Toekomstdromen: Leven tussen hoop en vrees in de vroegmoderne tijd (Dreams for the Future: Living between Hope and Fear in the Early Modern Times)

Report by Marie Verbiest

Overview of the program

On the 25th of October 2024, the VNVNG held its 23rd annual conference in Leuven and presented Dreams for the Future: Living between Hope and Fear in the Early Modern Times as the overarching theme of discussion. Recent developments in this area of study have questioned the long-held belief that people in the premodern period experienced the future in radically different ways than they did in modern times: the premodern attitude towards the future was thought to be a rather conservative one, oriented backwards and defined by the ever-imminent end of times, while the modern times supposedly experienced the future as open-ended and full of possibilities. Challenging this simplified dichotomy, this conference set out to investigate the complex ways in which people of the early modern times envisioned and tried to shape their futures.

The first speaker, post-doctoral researcher within the Back to the Future-project Elizabeth Heijmans (University of Antwerp), presented her research on forward-thinking as expressed in the correspondence of French merchants involved in the Atlantic trade from 1740 to 1760. Analysing these letters through a close reading and then systematically annotating each reference to the future, she ranked every one of them on a scale from “high insecurity” (expressing low levels of control) to “low insecurity” (expressing high levels of control). Taking a sample of these letters to counter a possible bias towards exceptional cases, she concluded that most merchants communicated a rather low level of insecurity about the future. Additionally, these letters talked primarily about the very near future and this in a mainly pragmatic way.

As part of her doctoral research, Jessica den Oudsten (Radboud University) focused on the lives of immigrants and their descendants in premodern Amsterdam. Using mostly baptismal, marriage, and funeral registers, as well as notarial archives, she tried to study the ways in which social mobility interacted with prospects and plans for the future in immigrants’ lives. Despite the richness of information that she found in these sources, they didn’t explicitly reference the future. She concluded furthermore that social mobility was complicated by the extreme difficulty immigrants faced to amass capital for their posterity.

Approaching the subject from a different angle was Professor Steven Vanden Broecke (University of Ghent), whose presentation centered on the role of forecasting in the neo- stoic culture of the Southern Netherlands (ca. 1630). Specifically, he focused on Dutch astronomer and Catholic priest Govaert Wendelen (1580-1667) and his Diluvio-project, which investigated the two eschatological disasters that delimited the beginning and the ending of human history: the universal flood (or deluge) on the one side, and the final conflagration on the other. Concluding that Wendelen’s theory was heavily influenced by the politics of his own time, Vanden Broecke mainly argued for the importance of studying intellectual histories within their historical and political context, leaving the role that these imagined disasters could have played in people’s thinking and acting with regard to the future uncommented on.

The fourth speaker, post-doctoral lecturer Anna-Luna Post (Utrecht University), presented her research on land reclamation projects in the early modern Netherlands, specifically the plans concerning the Haarlemmermeer (1617-1642). While these types of projects serve a mainly triumphant narrative in Dutch historiography, they nonetheless reveal characteristics which Post compares to practices of domination and appropriation in the colonies, as can be seen for example in the forced relocation and people’s loss of income following the disappearance of the water. She concluded that the campaigners of these projects, in order to persuade potential investors and interested parties to endorse their plans, painted a very utopian picture of the future, appealing to narratives of ‘modernization’ in various ways.

Ending the conference with a few closing remarks was Professor Jeroen Puttevils (University of Antwerp), coordinator of the ERC-funded Back to the Future-project conducted at the University of Antwerp. After giving some general background of historians’ interest in the study of the future, he mainly highlighted the importance of differentiation when dealing with this topic. Considering social, political, geographical and even conceptual differences regarding the future, we should always keep in mind that there is no such thing as one early modern experience of ‘The Future’, but instead an abundance of complex experiences, revealing multiple interacting futures.